Take-aways
from the IAWS conference 2020 (27th-31st January), the
theme of which was constitutional principles in 21st century
India: visions for emancipation.
Scholars,
activists, practitioners and others interested in gender, law, and society had
gathered over the four days at the National Law University, Delhi. Project Kal
participated in the sub-theme on women, employment and education, where we
presented our paper titled Finding the Missing Men: Reframing Gender Equality
Policy and Practice and engaged with other papers under the sub-theme.
Opening
Conversations
One of the
objectives of the conference was to link academia and activism. The symbiotic
relationship between intellectual scholarship and activism was acknowledged.
That gender discrimination exists in access to nutrition, healthcare,
education, and employment has been normalised. What has also been normalised is
sexual violence against women and girls. Few cases of such violence come to
light- either due to the determination of the survivor, or identity of the
survivor (as an urban, middle class woman as in the case of Delhi in 2012 and
Hyderabad in 2020). Perhaps the majority of sexual violence- within homes,
workplaces- is invisible yet well-known.
Reimagining
Gender Roles?
Support for
‘women’s empowerment’ has not been at the cost of male privilege. So, while
there has been a change in women’s roles, men’s roles have remained static,
leading to doubling of female responsibilities. One of papers explored this
‘superwoman phenomenon’ where women are expected to excel in both their
productive and reproductive roles. One of the factors that leads to such a
pressure is the notion that children (and the household) are primarily the
mother’s responsibility. Another paper looked into the statistical invisibility
of unpaid work of women, based on a study in the Indian state of Tripura.
Access to
education- the starting point or the destination?
Gender-specific
reasons for dropouts were discussed by a paper that emphasised that education
shall only be instrumental in achieving gender parity if the curriculum includes
gender sensitisation on biases, roles and attitudes. Another paper viewed
education as a contradictory resource that instils greater confidence in girls
(and boys) but also pulls them into the circle of inequality, without adequate
employment opportunities.
Gender-neutral
finance?
One of the
papers examined the false assumption that budgets are gender-neutral such that
they have the same impact for males and females. It called for a need for
gender budgeting not just on policy documents but also in the implementation
plans.
Gender
Auditing of Textbooks
Papers that
studied textbook content from a gender lens revealed that it leaves a lot to
desired. Although all education policies in the country view education as a
tool for social change, to bring in gender equality, the intent is not being
followed-up in the teaching learning materials. There is evidence of gender
biases in textbooks across national and state boards. This is an area that
merits both research and programmatic interventions.
Opening up the
Conversation
The conference
was a very engaging, insightful and interesting experience, largely due to the
diversity of its participants. What it did reinforce for us at Project Kal was
that there is a strong need to engage with boys and men, issues around
masculinities for an effective conversation that reaches beyond such gatherings
of conscious and interested participants. And education, as was agreed upon by
all, is a powerful instrument to initiate that conversation.
This piece was first published on Project Kal's website and can be accessed at- https://projectkal.org/our-voice/2020/3/2/iaws-2020-thoughts-learnings-and-takeaways.
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete